San Francisquito Catchment - 10 m LiDAR Controlled Event
Purpose​
This example presents the San Francisquito 10 m LiDAR simulation. It shows how the model responds when the terrain is represented with a finer DEM.
Case setup​
The 10 m example uses:
- a real 10 m USGS or 3DEP DEM for the Stanford domain;
- ancillary Stanford rasters aligned to that 10 m grid;
- the same controlled rainfall event used in the 30 m example;
- a perimeter outlet treatment.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Grid resolution | 10 m |
| Forcing | 100 mm/h for 1 hour |
| Simulation duration | 6 h |
| Map output interval | 15 min |
| Saved map frames | 24 |
| Routing family | Local inertial |
| Outlet treatment | Perimeter outlet |
Simulation video​
The animation below shows the 10 m simulation. The panels show flood depth, velocity, hazard metric, and cumulative infiltration.
San Francisquito 10 m LiDAR simulation: flood depth, velocity, hazard, and cumulative infiltration over six hours.
Six-hour response summary​
The summary below refers to the same six-hour simulation shown in the map sequence.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Grid resolution | 10 m |
| Published duration | 6 h |
| Saved map frames | 24 |
| Map sequence covered | 00:00 to 05:45 |
| Peak outlet flow in the six-hour window | 448.06 m³/s |
| Peak timing | 180.00 min |
| Outlet flow at 6 h | 115.69 m³/s |
| Maximum saved-frame depth | 6.91 m |
| Maximum saved-frame velocity | 10.00 m/s |
| Maximum saved-frame hazard metric | 25.38 m²/s |
| Maximum cumulative infiltration | 474.60 mm |
Hydrograph and rainfall​
What this example shows​
This example highlights:
- the effect of a finer terrain representation on local inundation patterns;
- the early routed response during the first six simulation hours;
- the differences that emerge when the same forcing is applied on the 10 m and 30 m domains.